Prof. Hilbay responds to Roque’s position on joint explorations in the West Philippine Sea

Professor Hilbay responds to Presidential spokesperson Harry Roque’s position on joint explorations in the West Philippine Sea

Sec. Harry Roque defends the President’s proposed “60-40” deal with China by arguing that the Supreme Court decision in La Bugal v. DENR justifies the sell-out.
_
With due respect to my former colleague in UPLaw:
_
WHY MALACAÑANG’S INVADER-FRIENDLY INTERPRETATION OF OUR CONSTITUTION IS WRONG.

(more…)

Continue Reading Prof. Hilbay responds to Roque’s position on joint explorations in the West Philippine Sea

ConstiTutok InfoSeries PART 2B : Attempts to Amend the 1973 Constitution

ConstiTutok InfoSeries PART 2B : Attempts to Amend the 1973 Constitution The Institute of Government and Law Reform (IGLR) of the UP Law Center, continues its ConstiTutok InfoSeries with PART 2B on Attempts to Amend the 1973 Constitution available at fb.com/uplawcentergovtlawreform The ConstiTutok InfoSeries reviews the legal history of the country’s Charter. Constitutional change is an ongoing topic of current mass media reporting, with summary reports on the contents of proposed drafts and the differing views of individuals who are either for or against the amendment of the Constitution. To assist the citizenry in gaining a more thorough understanding of…

Continue Reading ConstiTutok InfoSeries PART 2B : Attempts to Amend the 1973 Constitution

Maritime Law expert critiques proposed constitutional amendments on Philippine sovereignty

Maritime Law expert critiques proposed constitutional amendments on Philippine sovereignty Professor Jay Batongbacal, Director of the Institute of Maritime Affairs and Law of the Sea of the UP Law Center made some fundamental comments on Constitution making. In an ANC Early Edition interview, he critiqued draft amendments to Articles 1 and 2 (Philippine Territory) of the Constitution being proposed by the Consultative Committee to review the Constitution. He observed that the Articles should be succinct in that they should avoid details in the description of the national territory and should provide for flexibility.  The good Professor explained that the Constitution is for all…

Continue Reading Maritime Law expert critiques proposed constitutional amendments on Philippine sovereignty

Prof. Tony La Viña: The Future of our Constitution

Prof. Tony La Viña: The Future of our Constitution Commenting on Professor Dante Gatmaytan’s professorial lecture on “The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Deconsecration,” columnist of Eagle Eyes, Tony La Viña, reflects on the impact of the quo warranto Hearing in the Supreme Court, against Chief Justice Sereno.  The article reflects on the likely impact — of a decision granting the petition — on: constitutional rule, the judiciary itself, and on the teaching of constitutional law in the country; whether the quo warranto case can be properly decided pro hac vice; and that “it will radically overturn our constitutional system not just of accountability but also of…

Continue Reading Prof. Tony La Viña: The Future of our Constitution

Prof. Dante Gatmaytan: 2018 Estelito P. Mendoza Professorial Chair Lecture

Prof. Dante Gatmaytan: 2018 Estelito P. Mendoza Professorial Chair Lecture Professor Dante Gatmaytan, holder of the Estelito P. Mendoza Professorial Chair in Law delivered his annual lecture for 2018, on The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Deconsecration: The Philippines Under Duterte, on 16 April at the UP College of Law. The lecturer expounded on how constitutional amendments may not be enough in strengthening the Courts, and how in the face of constitutional collapse courts cooperate in their own demise by refusing to challenge executive abuses. Gracing the occasion was the donor of the Chair, Solicitor Estelito Mendoza who also delivered a comment during the…

Continue Reading Prof. Dante Gatmaytan: 2018 Estelito P. Mendoza Professorial Chair Lecture

From Talk to Tangibles: Setting the tone for Law Complex fora

From Talk to Tangibles: Setting the tone for Law Complex fora In her opening remarks for the forum Trashing Paradise, Dean FCT called for ‘talk’ to end in tangibles. Touching on the contribution of the UP Law Center to national discourse, the Dean conceded the need for discussions on national issues, within academe, in order to raise public awareness; but, she said that such forums need to be turned/translated into action. She suggested that the Law Center could adopt focused projects through networking with government agencies and NGOs to demonstrate through model projects on how to resolve a given public interest issue. Trashing…

Continue Reading From Talk to Tangibles: Setting the tone for Law Complex fora

End of content

No more pages to load