Prof Aguiling-Pangalangan’s FLP Lecture

Professor Elizabeth Aguiling-Pangalangan: “Parents and Children: When Law and Technology Unbundle Traditional Identities” (FLP Professorial Chair Lecture) Professor Elizabeth Aguiling-Pangalangan delivered the lecture  "Parents and Children: When Law and Technology Unbundle Traditional Identities" as part of the Foundation for Liberty and Prosperity Professorial Chair on March 28, 2019, at the University of the Philippines-College of Law. Her lecture is part of a series of public lectures conducted under the Chief Justice Panganiban Professorial Chairs on Liberty and Prosperity to encourage educational institutions and law schools to research and propagate the philosophy of safeguarding of liberty and nurturing of prosperity under…

Continue Reading Prof Aguiling-Pangalangan’s FLP Lecture

Prof Te on the Application of a Law “ex post facto”

Prof. Te: Deep freeze for the constitutional guarantee against ex post facto laws In the column “Deep Dive” of 15 Feb. 2019, Professor Theodore Te dissects the arrests of Rappler CEO Maria Ressa and of former Rappler researcher Reynaldo Santos, Jr., on grounds of the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws. The theory of the DOJ on cyber libel being a “continuing crime” and its prescriptive period being subject to “multiple republication,” is what the court will have to resolve, writes Professor Te. His position is that “multiple republication” or “continuing crime” are not principles that apply to libel,…

Continue Reading Prof Te on the Application of a Law “ex post facto”

Prof Grecia-De Vera on the Philippine Competition Act

Prof. Gwen Grecia-De Vera: "Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law: A Context for Coordination and Harmonization" "Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law: A Context for Coordination and Harmonization" Prof. Gwen Grecia-De Vera Link: Ateneo Law Journal Vol. 62, No. 4, 2018 In enacting the Philippine Competition Act (PCA), does the Philippines’ pursuit in combating disadvantageous monopolies defeat the rights given by the Intellectual Property Code, as well as the constitutional mandate to preserve technology, knowledge, and the arts? To answer the question, the Author looks into the two laws mentioned, determines the possible conflicts between them, and attempts to find a…

Continue Reading Prof Grecia-De Vera on the Philippine Competition Act

Prof Te: Legal Lesson on Service of Penalty

Prof. Theodore Te: Legal lesson on service of Penalty Professor Theodore Te, who teaches Criminal Law in UP, explains the Sandiganbayan ruling convicting former First Lady Imelda Marcos of graft, under RA 3019. In Rappler’s online column “Deep Dive” Professor Te, who served as Court Administrator until recently, touched on questions such as: the effect of age on the 89 year old Marcos serving her sentence; her absence in court on the day of promulgation as required under the Rules of Procedure; whether she can post bail in the event that she appeals the ruling to the Supreme Court; and…

Continue Reading Prof Te: Legal Lesson on Service of Penalty

IMLOS Director on ASEAN-China Code of Conduct

Maritime Law expert discusses draft code of conduct between ASEAN and China In a continuing public conversation on the subject, Director of IMLOS Professor Jay Batongbacal discusses the draft code of conduct in the South China Sea that is being proposed between ASEAN and China. Recognized for his expertise in the Law of the Sea, Professor Batongbacal is oft sought by print and broadcast media to explain the rapid developments taking place in the waters of the Region. The first three of these discussions may be accessed at : ASEAN draft code of conduct with China signals start of negotiations:…

Continue Reading IMLOS Director on ASEAN-China Code of Conduct

Rule 130 Justifies Secondary Evidence (Rules of Court)

Professor Antonio La Viña: Secondary evidence is justified by Rule 130 of the Rules of Court Legal lesson 3: Secondary evidence is justified by Rule 130 of the Rules of Court Sec. 5   "When the original document has been lost or destroyed, or cannot be produced in court, the offeror, upon proof of its execution or existence and the cause of its unavailability without bad faith on his part, may prove its contents by a copy, or by a recital of its contents in some authentic document, or by the testimony of witnesses in the order stated." Professor Tony La…

Continue Reading Rule 130 Justifies Secondary Evidence (Rules of Court)

End of content

No more pages to load